Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Dec 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Moss

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Moss

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
67
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 54, typical 45
Average sentence
13 words
Next steps
5
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

What needs to improve 18%About the inspection 82%

Full report text

Ofsted good practice survey: value for money in schools

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation and that of your staff during my visit on 9 November 2010 to look at how the school achieves good value for money.

p.1

Ofsted good practice survey: value for money in schools

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted good practice survey: value for money in schools

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews and discussions with various members of staff and a representative of the governing body; discussions with students; viewing of video materials; and scrutiny of documentation.

p.1

Features of good practice

 An exceptionally clear and corporate sense of educational values and purpose; nothing is pursued that cannot be related directly to this sense of mission.  Careful planning and preparation of proposed developments based on clear analysis of students’ learning needs.  Key risks associated with projects are identified along with strategies for dealing with any eventualities.  An emphasis on developing internal capacity and reducing dependence on external expertise, most notably for the purposes of staff development, while securing higher-quality outcomes.  Careful oversight of budgets and expenditure by the governing body and leaders and managers. Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Features of good practice

Mrs A Pontifex Headteacher St John Bosco Arts College Stonedale Crescent Croxteth Merseyside L11 9DQ  Very effective use of a wide range of benchmarking tools; financial, performance-related and qualitative.  A flexible approach that responds rapidly to changing circumstances, including contingency planning for major developments.  The widespread involvement of members of staff in making decisions to ensure that available expertise is used most effectively.  Keen awareness of the relationship between activities and students’ progress and attainment informed by careful analysis of data.  Good use of students’ views to inform planning and evaluation.

p.1

Areas for development

 There are no significant areas for development.

p.2

Areas for development

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop the school.

p.2

Areas for development

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion