Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 30 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Robert Ellis

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Robert Ellis

  • Postcode verified

    CR2 6DT

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+73Very positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallypositivegood progressimprovedstrengthsexceptionalexemplary
Criticismweaknessesinadequatepoorbelowdeclineexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings813w+55
  • Leadership303w+82
  • What needs to improve61w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,176
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 35, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 25%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Mrs C A Alcock Principal Harris Academy Purley Kendra Hall Road South Croydon CR2 6DT

p.1

Introduction

Following my visit to your academy with Angela Corbett HMI on 9 and 10 November 2010, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Introduction

The inspection was a first monitoring inspection in connection with the academies initiative.

p.1

Evidence

Inspectors observed the academy’s work, scrutinised documents, visited 21 lessons, met with the Principal, federation chief executive officer and staff. The lead inspector also held a telephone conversation with the academy’s School Improvement Partner. Informal conversations were held with students in lessons and during breaks.

p.1

Context

Around one quarter of the 807 students who attend the academy are of White British heritage and the remainder are from diverse minority ethnic groups. Girls make up around two fifths of the student population. The overall proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is twice the national average. More students have special educational needs and/or disabilities than is typical for a school of this size. The academy has a relatively stable student population and is oversubscribed for the 2011 entry, but there are currently places available in some year groups. The majority of staff transferred from the predecessor school and the academy experienced some staff turbulence in its first year. The recently established Serco Inspections Boundary House 2 Wythall Green Way Middle Lane BIRMINGHAM West Midlands B47 6LW OFSTED T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Context

SERCO Direct T 0121 683 2888 sixth form has 32 students and operates as part of a collaborative arrangement with other academies from the Harris Federation. The academy is housed in the buildings of the predecessor school but there are plans for a building programme and further refurbishment. The academy’s specialisms are in enterprise and sports.

p.1

Pupils’ achievement and the extent to which they enjoy their learning

The majority of students start at the academy having achieved well below average standards at their previous schools. In the academy’s first year 47% of students achieved five or more GCSE passes at grades A*to C including both English and mathematics. Although just below the national average, this represents good progress in relation to their starting points. The academy’s tracking data and inspectors’ observations of students’ work in lessons show that a rapidly increasing proportion of students are on track to achieve or exceed very challenging targets. The quality of learning is good and improving rapidly because of good and sometimes outstanding teaching, improved attendance and students’ increasingly positive attitudes to learning.

p.2

Other relevant pupil outcomes

Behaviour in classrooms is generally good. There has been a marked decline in the number of incidents involving inappropriate behaviour and a similar reduction in the number of fixed-term exclusions. Attendance and punctuality have improved rapidly with attendance now above average. Increasing numbers of students are grasping the opportunities offered to take responsibility as, for example, specialism leaders who promote the academy’s specialisms. Students express positive views about the academy.

p.2

The effectiveness of provision

When the academy first opened it judged that too much teaching was inadequate and there was not enough that was good or better. Rigorous and systematic monitoring of teaching and learning identified strengths and weaknesses and a variety of means were used to rapidly improve the profile of teaching. Improvements mean that teachers now have higher expectations of students and lesson planning takes good account of their prior attainment. Many lessons are taught at a brisk pace and teachers use a good range of resources and different activities to engage and challenge students. Although many teachers use effective questioning to gauge understanding and develop learning, in a few lessons questions are not targeted sufficiently at the different abilities within the class. In the best practice, which is seen in the majority of lessons, students get good feedback. Most marking identifies strengths, targets for improvement and how these targets can be achieved.

p.2

The effectiveness of provision

However, in a few cases marking provides too little guidance on how work can be improved or developed and does not refer to what students were expected to learn. In the best lessons, imaginative use of interactive whiteboards contributes strongly to students’ learning and enjoyment as well as providing them with helpful hints and tips.

p.2

The effectiveness of provision

The curriculum has been developed significantly so that it meets the needs of students and is increasingly personalised. Most impact is evident at Key Stage 4 where detailed pathways for students to follow have been established to ensure all students, regardless of their ability or starting points, can develop their skills, knowledge and understanding and make the progress of which they are capable. Good progress has been made in promoting the enterprise specialism but development of the sports specialism is at an early stage. The specialisms are broadening students’ experiences and developing important life skills such as leadership and endeavour.

p.3

The effectiveness of provision

Students are cared for very well. Pastoral care is extremely well organised and the academy can demonstrate many notable successes in improving behaviour, attendance and achievement for particular individuals.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

The academy is led exceptionally well. The Principal and senior team have an ambitious vision for the academy and they have been successful in inspiring staff and students who now share a common sense of purpose.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

The academy has secured exceptional improvement in the short time since it was established and the positive impact of the actions taken demonstrate an outstanding capacity for further improvement. Self-evaluation is very accurate and, consequently, those responsible for leading the academy have an exceptionally clear picture of its strengths and areas for development. The management and development of staff is exemplary and there has been a dramatic improvement in the quality of teaching. Senior leaders have unflinchingly challenged poor performance and provided high quality professional development opportunities which have been valued by staff. Middle leadership is being developed rapidly and the work of middle leaders is starting to have a positive impact on accelerating the pace of improvement. Governors are well informed and holding the academy to account. For example, they have looked closely at the academy’s self-evaluation and challenged senior leaders’

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

judgements. External consultants were used to verify the self-evaluation and to confirm an accurate baseline from which future progress can be measured.

p.3

The effectiveness of leaders and managers

The academy’s improvement plan is based on rigorous and systematic evaluation of performance data. There are clear priorities for improvement that address weaknesses and areas for improvement. Actions taken by the academy are managed well and quality assured to ensure that they have maximum impact on improving outcomes for students.

p.3

External support

The Harris Federation makes a strong contribution to all aspects of the academy’s work. There is excellent support for subject teams through networks that enable the sharing of resources and good practice. Productive relationships have been developed with outside agencies to promote students well-being.

p.4

Main Judgements

The academy has made outstanding progress towards raising standards.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Build on improvements to leadership and management at middle leadership level so that leaders and managers are further empowered and enabled to drive improvement.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State for Education, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Academies Group at the Department for Education. This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion