Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Nell Banfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nell Banfield

  • Postcode verified

    HX7 8EE

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovingimprovedclearlypreciselykeenaccurate
Criticismgapslimitednot yetmissedlower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings505w−5
  • What needs to improve110w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
600
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 82%What needs to improve 18%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs V Eggleton Headteacher Riverside Junior School Holme Street Hebden Bridge HX7 8EE

p.1

progress (APP)

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 7 October 2010 to evaluate the impact of the APP initiative.

p.1

progress (APP)

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

progress (APP)

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: scrutiny of documentation; observations of teaching and learning; and discussions with senior leaders, other staff and pupils and a representative from the local authority.

p.1

progress (APP)

The overall use of assessment to support learning is satisfactory.

p.1

Impact on pupils’ achievement and attainment

 The use of APP criteria contributed to improved attainment at the higher levels in English and mathematics in 2010.  APP is helping to identify gaps in the learning of lower-attaining pupils and target support to tackle them. Consequently, these pupils are now making better progress.  The improvement in teachers’ understanding of assessment criteria, and clearer feedback in marking, is accelerating pupils’ achievement in writing.

p.1

Impact on the quality of pupils’ learning and progress

 The use of APP assessments is developing teachers’ understanding of progression so that, when necessary, they revisit topics and introduce new learning opportunities to consolidate pupils’ learning.  APP, and linked materials, help teachers to understand more clearly what pupils can do and what they need to learn to move to the next level. However, opportunities for pupils to be involved in peer- and self- assessment are limited.  Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are benefiting from teachers’ use of APP criteria because interventions to support their learning are targeted more precisely.  As a result of using APP, teachers are improving the quality and frequency of discussions with pupils about their work. This is improving pupils’ engagement with learning. Discussions do not yet include what helps pupils to learn best, so opportunities are missed for pupils to contribute to

p.2

support learning

 APP is helping teachers to evaluate progress during lessons so that they can adjust their teaching to raise, maintain or lower the level of challenge.  The use of APP is encouraging a dialogue between teachers about assessment practice and improving their understanding of how to accelerate pupils’ progress. A shared language for assessment is beginning to develop, with more work to do.  Teachers are gaining confidence in using APP; recent steps to develop a clearer and more pupil-friendly language to discuss assessments is supporting discussions about learning with, and between, pupils.  Teachers find moderation of assessment across parallel classes helpful and are keen to benefit from wider collaboration so that they can strengthen their understanding of what learning at different levels looks like.

p.2

Impact on the curriculum

 The use of APP is beginning to improve teachers’ subject knowledge so that they plan better opportunities for pupils to practise skills and apply their understanding.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

 improving the accuracy of assessments across all core subject areas  developing teachers’ understanding of the link between assessment, accurate target-setting and improving pupils’ progress  increasing opportunities for pupils to assess their own and others’ work, and express what helps them to learn best. I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop assessment practice in support of school improvement.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, include:

As explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion