Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Nov 2010

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Sonya Williamson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Sonya Williamson

  • Postcode verified

    SK22 4AY

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+7Mostly positivemore positive than 28% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongexcellentenjoymentstrengthssupportiveeffectivestrengthdelight
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatelimitedweaknesseslacknot yetnot clearnot robust

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings480w−3
  • Leadership226w+11
  • What needs to improve120w+29

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
803
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
11%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms C Whetstone Headteacher New Mills Primary School Meadow Street New Mills High Peak SK22 4AY

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of the staff and pupils, during my visit on 23 September 2010 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements included: interviews with staff and pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of five lessons.

p.1

Ofsted 2010–11 subject survey inspection programme: geography

The overall effectiveness of geography is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in geography

Achievement in geography is satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement in geography

 By the end of Key Stage 2, pupils reach broadly average standards of attainment. They make satisfactory progress across the school but the quality of their learning in different year groups varies.  Generally, pupils’ understanding increases in depth and rigour as they move through the school. They have good knowledge of differences within countries such as Kenya, which they have studied, but have more limited knowledge of the key features of the United Kingdom and Europe.  Pupils’ investigative work and their problem-solving are relatively strong aspects of their skills development because they have good opportunities to undertake decision-making, such as in choosing the best locations for new developments.  Pupils use their studies in the local area well to help them understand its distinctive features, how it is similar to and diferent from other places and why they like living in New Mills.  Although pupils’ attitudes to learning are good overall, particularly when

p.1

Achievement in geography

working collaboratively in the school grounds, their understanding of what constitutes geography is more limited.

p.2

Quality of teaching of geography

The quality of teaching in geography is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching of geography

 Learning objectives are shared appropriately with pupils, and teachers structure learning well so that pupils know what they have to do. However, the nature and relevance of learning are not always made sufficiently clear to pupils.  Teachers monitor pupils’ progress adequately through the use of open- ended questions. However, the questions are not always sufficiently well- targeted to show what individual pupils know, understand and can do.  Teachers use a varied range of teaching and learning strategies that give apt consideration to different pupils’ learning preferences in their lessons.  Relevant and topical resources, including the use of information and communication technology are used well to support pupils’ learning.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

The quality of the curriculum in geography is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum in geography

 The recently developed thematic approach to the curriculum ensures that statutory requirements for geography are met. However, the curriculum is not yet well balanced, with some areas of geography being overly emphasised at the expense of others and there is also disparity across year groups.  Sustainability at local and global scales is a strong feature of the curriculum but the concepts of space, scale and interdependence are less well developed through teachers’ planning.  The curriculum is planned to ensure strong links to pupils’ literacy and numeracy skills. The school has rightly identified the need for further opportunties to support pupils’ social, moral, spiritual and cultural development.  The curriculum contains good opportunties for fieldwork in the school grounds, locally and further afield. This makes a good contribution to pupils’ enjoyment of geography but fieldwork skills are not being

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

The overall effectiveness of leadership and management in geography is inadequate.  Leaders have appropriately identified a few relevant aspects for improvement, such as continued curriculum adaptation and the enhanced use of assessment. They are aware of the need to evaluate and develop geography more rigorously. There is, currently, satisfactory capacity for improvement.  The monitoring of the effectiveness of geography has not been robust. It does not draw sufficiently on the analysis of pupils’ work, teachers’ planning, lesson observations and pupils’ views to inform the school about the strengths and weaknesses in terms of provision or pupils’ knowledge, skills and understanding.  There is no subject development plan and most staff lack a clear vision of how to promote and improve the subject.  Staff’s professional development needs have not been analysed and links with subject associations have not been used.

p.2

Effectiveness of leadership and management in geography

 Staffing and resourcing are supportive of effective work in geography. Pupils have access to excellent resources in the school grounds and good information and communication technology. The quality of the outdoor environment is a particular strength which pupils delight in and contribute to.  Geography makes a strong contribution to the promotion of community cohesion through an emphasis on learning in the local context, links with a South African school and newly emerging links with a school in a contrasting area of Manchester.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 improving teachers’ use of questioning to assess pupils’ learning  ensuring that the curriculum is well balanced and that it ensures the progressive development of skills and concepts  developing the rigour of monitoring, evaluation and improvement planning  evaluating staff’s professional development needs and exploring the use of support and training provided by the subject associations.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

I hope that these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

As I explained previously, a copy of this letter will be published on the Ofsted website. It may be used to inform decisions about any future inspection. Except in the case of academies, a copy of this letter is also being sent to your local authority.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion