Other · Ofsted report
Childminder in Lambeth
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
18 Mar 2010
- Inspectors verified
Mauvene Burke
- URN verified
EY387352
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 6
- Words of findings
- 1,177
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Inspection report for early years provision
p.1
Unique reference number EY387352 Inspection date 18/03/2010 Inspector Mauvene Burke
p.1
Type of setting Childminder to achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It rates council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please telephone 0300 123 1231, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way.
p.1
Royal Exchange Buildings St Ann's Square Manchester M2 7LA
p.2
T: 0300 123 1231 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.2
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under Sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of the registered early years provision. ‘Early years provision’ refers to provision regulated by Ofsted for children from birth to 31 August following their fifth birthday (the early years age group). The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and welfare, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.3
Introduction
The provider must provide a copy of this report to all parents with children at the setting where reasonably practicable. The provider must provide a copy of the report to any other person who asks for one, but may charge a fee for this service (The Childcare (Inspection) Regulations 2008 regulations 9 and 10).
p.3
Introduction
The setting also makes provision for children older than the early years age group which is registered on the voluntary and/or compulsory part(s) of the Childcare Register. This report does not include an evaluation of that provision, but a comment about compliance with the requirements of the Childcare Register is included in Annex B.
p.3
Introduction
There were no children on roll when this inspection took place. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with those who care for the children and an inspection of the premises, equipment and relevant documentation. Where there are no children on roll, no judgement is made on the quality of the early years provision as there is no reliable evidence on which to assess its impact on children. The report states if the provider continues to meet the requirements of registration.
p.3
Introduction
Please see our website for more information about each childcare provider. We publish inspection reports, conditions of registration and details of complaints we receive where we or the provider take action to meet the requirements of registration. This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.3
Description of the childminding
The childminder was registered in 2009. She lives with her three children aged five and four years and 14 months in Brixton, situated in the London borough of Lambeth. The childminder's home is situated on the third floor of a block of flats with lift access. The childminder uses only the first floor of her home for childminding.
p.4
Description of the childminding
The childminder is registered to care for a maximum of two children under eight years at any one time, of whom no more than one may be in the early age range. This provision is registered by Ofsted on the Early Years Register and both the compulsory and voluntary parts of the Childcare register. There are currently no children on roll. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with those who care for the children and an inspection of the premises, equipment and relevant documentation.
p.4
Description of the childminding
The childminder walks to local schools, parks and shops and regularly attends a toddler group. She is a member of the National Childminding Association and has a Level 3 qualification in Childcare .
p.4
The overall effectiveness of the early years provision
The childminder has not, as required, attended a training course within six months of her registration as a childminder. This is a specific legal requirement of the Welfare Requirements. She does, however, hold a valid first aid certificate. The childminder demonstrates a secure understanding of the indicators for abuse and neglect and how to report child protection concerns in accordance with the Local Safeguarding Children Board procedures. The childminder has developed consent forms for parents to complete at induction and should the need arise such as the administration of medicine and managing accidents. The childminder can explain how she would liaise with other agencies in order to develop consistency for the children in her care. She demonstrates a sound understanding of how to promote and manage children's behaviour taking account of their individual ages and stage of development. Children with special educational needs would be supported
p.4
The overall effectiveness of the early years provision
because the childminder explains how to access professional support when needed. She demonstrates an understanding of equal opportunities and how children can gain an understanding of differences, however, her resources do not promote all aspects of diversity.
p.4
The overall effectiveness of the early years provision
Although the childminder has devised a written risk assessment form which covers the home, garden, toys, resources and outings, a record of her assessments have not been kept, therefore, not reviewed. Nonetheless, on the day of the inspection, no hazards were identified. Observations made during the inspection show that toys and resources are organised so that children can independently access them, this will encourage children to make choices and promote their independence.
p.4
The overall effectiveness of the early years provision
The childminder has limited knowledge of the learning and development requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage, particularly in regards to the six areas of learning. She has not considered how she will plan for individual children's This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 needs and does not understand how observations should be linked to the areas of learning in order to chart children's progress and plan for their next steps. Discussions with the childminder show that although she does not have any formal systems in place to help her self evaluate her practice, she has identified her weaknesses and the areas for improvement. She is committed to improving outcomes for children by enrolling in further training.
p.4
Compliance with registration requirements
In order to continue to meet the requirements of registration, the registered person must take the following action by the specified date:
p.5
Compliance with registration requirements
attend an approved local authority training course (Qualifictions, training, knowledge and skills) 30/04/2010
p.5
Compliance with registration requirements
develop further resources and activities to nurture children's respect for their own cultures and beliefs and those of other peoples (Suitable premises,environment & equipment) 30/04/2010
p.5
Compliance with registration requirements
develop knowledge and understanding of the learning and development requirements and develop systems for using observations, assessment and information from parents, to plan next steps in learning for individual children (Educational programmes) 30/04/2010
p.5
Compliance with registration requirements
maintain a record of the risk assessment clearly stating when it was carried out, by whom, date of review and any action taken following a review or incident (Documentation). 30/04/2010 This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.5
Annex B: the Childcare Register
The provider confirms that the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register are: Met
p.6
Annex B: the Childcare Register
The provider confirms that the requirements of the voluntary part of the Childcare Register are: Met
p.6
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion