Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
8 Jul 2009
- Inspectors verified
Jill Spiteri
- Postcode verified
BS4 4HP
- Name on report verified
Hamilton Pre-School
- URN verified
106967
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- How well are children helped to stay safe? 3 How well are children helped to be healthy? 3 How well are children helped to enjoy and achieve? 3 How well are children helped to make a positive contribution? p.6
- When asked to share their comments about the pre-school several parents express their gratitude to staff for developing the confidence of their children and are positive about the provision stating that communication has improved. p.5
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The provider must provide a copy of this report to all parents with children at the setting where reasonably practicable. p.2
- The provider must provide a copy of the report to any other person who asks for one, but may charge a fee for this service (The Childcare (Inspection) Regulations 2008 regulations 9 and 10). p.2
- develop planning to show how children’s next steps can be used to help extend and challenge them in their learning This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 To fully meet the specific requirements of the EYFS, the registered person must: p.3
- To further improve the early years provision the registered person should: p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 7
- Words of findings
- 1,538
- longer than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Hamilton Pre-School Inspection report for early years provision
p.1
Unique reference number 106967 Inspection date 08/07/2009 Inspector Jill Spiteri
p.1
Setting address Holymead Junior School Annexe, Wick Road, Brislington, Bristol, BS4 4HP Telephone number 0117 9144471 Email hamiltonpre-school@hotmail.co.uk Type of setting Childcare on non-domestic premises This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.1
Introduction
This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under Sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of the registered early years provision. ‘Early years provision’ refers to provision regulated by Ofsted for children from birth to 31 August following their fifth birthday (the early years age group). The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and welfare, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.
p.2
Introduction
The provider must provide a copy of this report to all parents with children at the setting where reasonably practicable. The provider must provide a copy of the report to any other person who asks for one, but may charge a fee for this service (The Childcare (Inspection) Regulations 2008 regulations 9 and 10).
p.2
Introduction
The setting also makes provision for children older than the early years age group which is registered on the voluntary and/or compulsory part(s) of the Childcare Register. This report does not include an evaluation of that provision, but a comment about compliance with the requirements of the Childcare Register is included in Annex B. This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.2
Description of the setting
Hamilton Pre-School has been operating since 1995. It is situated within a classroom annexe of Holymead Junior School in Brislington, Bristol. The setting has disabled access via a ramp and the activity rooms are on one level. Hamilton Pre- School provides care for children from within the local area. The pre-school is registered on the Early Years Register, the compulsory part of the Childcare Register and the voluntary part of the Childcare Register.
p.3
Description of the setting
The group is registered for 28 children. There are currently 45 children aged from three to five-years-old on roll. This includes 22 funded three-year-olds, 22 funded four-year-olds and one three-year-old who is not funded. Children attend for a variety of sessions. The group is inclusive, supporting children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and children who speak English as an additional language.
p.3
Description of the setting
The group opens mornings and afternoons each weekday during term-times. Sessions are from 09.00 until 11.30 each morning and from 12.30 until 15.00 each afternoon. The group operates with seven members of staff, of whom three staff have an early years qualification, one play leader holds NVQ at level 3. There are developing links with a local infant school and playgroup.
p.3
Overall effectiveness of the early years provision
Overall the quality of the Early Years Foundation Stage provision is satisfactory. Caring staff members support the children well, allowing them to settle quickly and develop confidence. The pre-school is inclusive and staff use observations to plan activities, both inside and outside, that match the interests of the children enabling them to make satisfactory progress. The play leaders are keen to evaluate their practice so that strengths and areas to develop are highlighted, however this process is not yet established. Children are kept safe as satisfactory safeguarding procedures and systems are in place, although these are not regularly reviewed. The capacity for continuous improvement is satisfactory.
p.3
further?
To further improve the early years provision the registered person should:
p.3
further?
develop clear systems of self evaluation to identify the setting’s strengths, weaknesses and priorities for development that will improve provision review the ‘free flow’ procedures to ensure the safety of all children at all times ensure that the written complaints procedure is accessible to parents ensure records of staff such as Criminal Records Bureau disclosures are suitably updated develop planning to show how children’s next steps can be used to help extend and challenge them in their learning This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 To fully meet the specific requirements of the EYFS, the registered person must:
p.3
further?
ensure that policies such as safeguarding, health and safety and equalities are regularly updated (Safeguarding and welfare) 01/09/2009 ensure risk assessments include responsibilities and dates for actions and are reviewed at least once a year or more frequently (Suitable premises, environment and equipment) 01/09/2009
p.4
provision
The two pre-school leaders have addressed the recommendations from the previous inspection report indicating that they have the capacity to continue to improve the provision. They work with the committee members to implement improvement. Links with parents are effective in sharing information so learning can be supported at home and staff are always available to discuss any issues. Currently, the setting’s written complaints policy is not made accessible to parents. Partnerships with the infant school and local playgroup are developing so that practice is becoming increasingly consistent and settings are gathering information about the children when they transfer.
p.4
provision
The pre-school supports children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, linking with external agencies such as the speech therapy to increase children’s development. Procedures, policies and risk assessments are in place to keep children safe, however these are not regularly updated. Staff meet together to share ideas informally three times throughout the year and a staff appraisal is in place to develop performance. There is not a clear system for evaluating effectiveness of the provision or an action plan that identifies areas for development and responsibilities. Adults attend training to support their professional development and have worked with the Early Years Foundation Stage adviser resulting in improved assessment procedures. The deployment of staff is effective in supporting the learning of all children. Key workers are clear about their role in creating the children’s learning diaries. The open morning was well-
p.4
provision
organised to offer prospective parents and children a chance to see the pre-school in action.
p.4
The quality and standards of the early years provision
Children are keen to enter the pre-school and are quickly ready to participate in activities. They are developing good speaking and listening skills as demonstrated by the responses they give to effective questions about the weather. One child commented that it was ‘a little bit rainy’, whilst another child responded that they ‘didn’t feel any rain.’
p.4
The quality and standards of the early years provision
After the calm start to the day, involving counting around the circle to identify the This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 number present, children choose their activities from a wide range covering each area of learning. Children are reminded about being nice, sharing and not running, resulting in good behaviour. Children play happily alongside each other and also join in cooperative play with occasional reminders about sharing and taking turns. A suitable balance of adult-led and free-choice activities are planned to cover the areas of learning. These daily activities are briefly reviewed for impact. Some of the activities are planned according to interests from the previous day, for example requests for a picnic have been accommodated for the bears in the cafe area. Children are being encouraged to learn about healthy eating as reflected in the variety of snacks which they enjoy, whilst also being prompted to use good
p.4
The quality and standards of the early years provision
manners. A child playing in the cafe offers ‘lettuce’ to the adult who asks for something healthy, but opportunities to extend knowledge in this activity are not developed. A child arriving late due to traffic is given time to explain her feelings, enabling her to develop emotionally and settle well. Signing is used appropriately to help language development, which enables all children to learn.
p.5
The quality and standards of the early years provision
Adults support learning in a variety of ways, for example, questioning to promote thinking, modelling writing, reading and using numbers in the environment enables the children to make satisfactory progress, although opportunities for challenge are sometimes missed. Assessment is recorded in learning diaries by the key workers in a variety of ways, including notes, photographs and samples of work which build a picture of the child. In order to ensure safety during the open morning children do not have access to outdoor play, which is normally available and offers a range of curriculum activities especially wheeled toys for physical development. At the end of the session all children help to clear away and tidy up.
p.5
The quality and standards of the early years provision
When asked to share their comments about the pre-school several parents express their gratitude to staff for developing the confidence of their children and are positive about the provision stating that communication has improved. This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.5
Annex A: record of inspection judgements
The key inspection judgements and what they mean
p.6
Annex A: record of inspection judgements
Grade 1 is Outstanding: this aspect of the provision is of exceptionally high quality Grade 2 is Good: this aspect of the provision is strong Grade 3 is Satisfactory: this aspect of the provision is sound Grade 4 is Inadequate: this aspect of the provision is not good enough
p.6
of children in the Early Years Foundation Stage?
How well does the provision promote inclusive practice? 3 The capacity of the provision to maintain continuous improvement.
p.6
Foundation Stage led and managed?
How effective is the setting’s self-evaluation, including the steps taken to promote improvement? How well does the setting work in partnership with parents and others? How well are children safeguarded? 3
p.6
Years Foundation Stage promoted?
How well are children helped to stay safe? 3 How well are children helped to be healthy? 3 How well are children helped to enjoy and achieve? 3 How well are children helped to make a positive contribution? How well are children helped develop skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being?
p.6
Years Foundation Stage promoted?
procedures set out in the guidance available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006
p.6
Annex B: the Childcare Register
The provider confirms that the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register are: Met
p.7
Annex B: the Childcare Register
The provider confirms that the requirements of the voluntary part of the Childcare Register are: Met
p.7
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion