Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Childminder in Croydon

Inspected 23 Apr 2009 · published 15 May 2009 · URN EY331988

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Elizabeth Anne Coffey

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    23 Apr 2009

  • Inspectors verified

    Elizabeth Anne Coffey

  • URN verified

    EY331988

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−83Very criticalmore positive than 2% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Criticismnot metweaklimitednot safe

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings529w−69
  • What needs to improve238w−73

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
762
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%What needs to improve 28%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection report for early years provision

p.1

Unique reference number EY331988 Inspection date 23/04/2009 Inspector Elizabeth Anne Coffey

p.1

Type of setting Childminder This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006

p.1

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by Ofsted under Sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006 on the quality and standards of the registered early years provision. ‘Early years provision’ refers to provision regulated by Ofsted for children from birth to 31 August following their fifth birthday (the early years age group). The registered person must ensure that this provision complies with the statutory framework for children’s learning, development and welfare, known as the Early Years Foundation Stage.

p.2

Introduction

The provider must provide a copy of this report to all parents with children at the setting where reasonably practicable. The provider must provide a copy of the report to any other person who asks for one, but may charge a fee for this service (The Childcare (Inspection) Regulations 2008 regulations 9 and 10).

p.2

Introduction

The setting also makes provision for children older than the early years age group which is registered on the voluntary and/or compulsory part(s) of the Childcare Register. This report does not include an evaluation of that provision, but a comment about compliance with the requirements of the Childcare Register is included in Annex B.

p.2

Introduction

There were no children on roll when this inspection took place. The findings in this report are based on evidence gathered from discussions with those who care for the children and an inspection of the premises, equipment and relevant documentation. Where there are no children on roll, no judgement is made on the quality of the early years provision as there is no reliable evidence on which to assess its impact on children. The report states if the provider continues to meet the requirements of registration. This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006

p.2

Description of the childminding

The childminder was registered in 2006. She lives with her husband and two children, aged seven years and 13 years old. They live in a house in Upper Norwood, in the London borough of Croydon. All areas of the home can be used for childminding purposes. There is a back garden which is not currently safe for minded children. However, the childminder uses local parks and open spaces for daily outdoor activities.

p.3

Description of the childminding

The childminder is registered on the Early Years Register and the compulsory part of the Childcare Register to care for a maximum of four children under eight years. There are currently no children in the early years age group on roll. The childminder is also registered on the voluntary part of the Childcare Register. The childminder has an early years qualification.

p.3

Overall effectiveness of the early years provision

The childminder does not meet all requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. The childminder has a limited awareness of the requirements of the Early Years Foundation Stage. However, she does demonstrate an understanding of the need to plan and provide a broad and varied curriculum that identifies and meets the learning and development needs of individual children. The childminder has an understanding of her responsibilities to safeguard children and to promote their welfare. However, public liability insurance has lapsed. Procedures for the sharing of information with parents and other agencies are in place, although a record of complaints in line with current regulations is not maintained. Systems for self- evaluation to ensure ongoing improvement are weak.

p.3

Compliance with registration requirements

In order to continue to meet the requirements of registration, the registered person must take the following action by the specified date:

p.3

Compliance with registration requirements

 develop knowledge and understanding of the Early Years Foundation Stage (EYFS) framework and guidance (Suitable people) 11/05/2009  keep a record of complaints and any subsequent action taken (Safeguarding and promoting children's welfare) (also applies to both parts of the Childcare Register) 11/05/2009  ensure public liability insurance is maintained (Suitable premises, environment and equipment) (also applies to both parts of the Childcare Register) 11/05/2009 This inspection was carried out under sections 49 and 50 of the Childcare Act 2006

p.3

Annex B: the Childcare Register

The provider confirms that the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register are: Not Met (with actions)

p.4

Annex B: the Childcare Register

The provider confirms that the requirements of the voluntary part of the Childcare Register are: Not Met (with actions)

p.4

Annex B: the Childcare Register

The registered provider does not meet the requirements of the compulsory and or voluntary part/s of the Childcare Register.

p.4

Annex B: the Childcare Register

To comply with the requirements of the compulsory part of the Childcare Register, the registered person must take the following action/s by the specified date:

p.4

Annex B: the Childcare Register

 take action as specified in the early years section of the report 11/05/2009

p.4

Annex B: the Childcare Register

To comply with the requirements of the voluntary part of the Childcare Register, the registered person must take the following action/s by the specified date:

p.4

Annex B: the Childcare Register

 take action as specified in the early years section of the report 11/05/2009

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion