Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Royal Grammar School

Inspected 13 Nov 2008 · published 4 Jun 2009 · URN SC049244

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clare Davies, Robert Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    13 Nov 2008

  • Inspectors AI-checked

    Clare Davies, Robert Smith

  • Postcode verified

    HP13 6QT

  • Name on report verified

    Royal Grammar School

Page 1 of 6
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 70% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenteffectiveoutstandingpositivelystrongextremelyvery highenjoy
Criticismconcernsnot sufficientlylacklower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1073w+75
  • What needs to improve175w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
6
Words of findings
1,225
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 9%

Full report text

Royal Grammar School Inspection report for boarding school

p.1

SC049244 Unique reference number 13 November 2008 Inspection date Robert Smith / Clare Davies Inspector Key Type of Inspection

p.1

Royal Grammar School Address Amersham Road HIGH WYCOMBE Buckinghamshire HP13 6QT 01494 524 955 Telephone number

p.1

Email

Buckinghamshire County Council Registered person Roy Page Head / Principal

p.1

Nominated person

9 February 2004 Date of last inspection .

p.1

Nominated person

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Nominated person

You can obtain copies of The Children Act 2004, Every Child Matters and The National Minimum Standards for Children's Services from: The Stationery Office (TSO) PO Box 29, St Cripins, Duke Street, Norwich, NR3 1GN. Tel: 0870 600 5522. Online ordering: www.tso.co.uk/bookshop

p.2

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000. This report details the main strengths and any areas for improvement identified during the inspection. The judgements included in the report are made in relation to the outcome for children set out in the Children Act 2004 and relevant National Minimum Standards for the establishment.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

this aspect of the provision is of exceptionally high quality Outstanding: this aspect of the provision is strong Good: this aspect of the provision is sound Satisfactory: this aspect of the provision is not good enough Inadequate: 3 of 7 Inspection Report: Royal Grammar School,13 November 2008

p.3

Summary

The overall quality rating is good. This is an overview of what the inspector found during the inspection.

p.4

Organisation

The organisation is good. The quality of boarding provision at the Royal Grammar School is good and the key National Minimum Standards are met. Boarders are well looked after and thoroughly enjoy and celebrate their boarding experience and opportunities. The enthusiasm of boarders is seen in comments from surveys such as 'It’s a great experience and we are well looked after and the staff are great,' The house tutors are good because I can go and talk to them whenever I want to' and 'It’s just generally great fun'. These comments confirm the warm and family-like atmosphere that is successfully promoted by the boarding staff team.

p.4

Organisation

The inspection identified many areas of strong practice as well as small number of areas for improvement. The school has fully and promptly addressed recommendations arising from previous inspections and acted to address emerging shortfalls as this inspection progressed.

p.4

Organisation

The school provides good support and guidance for boarders to help ensure they develop healthy lifestyles. Health care needs are well met by the school, drawing on external support and services where needed. Medication is generally well managed although there are minor shortfalls in the consistency of record-keeping and the clarity of risk considerations when boarder might self medicate. Boarders receive good quality meals from the dedicated catering service that supports the boarding house.

p.4

Organisation

The school takes great care to ensure boarders are kept safe. Pupils report no experience of bullying in boarding and are well protected by the school’s rigorous approach and prompt 4 of 7 Inspection Report: Royal Grammar School,13 November 2008 actions should any bullying occur. The school has comprehensive and effective systems in place to minimise the likelihood of abuse and there is excellent monitoring of pupils about whom there may be welfare concerns. Good attention is paid to ensuring boarders experience appropriate levels of privacy.

p.4

Organisation

Behaviour standards are extremely high and are supported by the school’s fair, transparent and effective approach to managing misbehaviour. The school has clear and effective systems in place for dealing with any concerns or complaints boarders might have.

p.5

Organisation

Recruitment processes are sound although not all the additional expectations of the relevant National Minimum Standards are being met in full. Structures for oversight of staff appointed prior to completion of all checks are not sufficiently formalised. Good attention is paid to ensuring boarders do not have contact with unchecked persons from outside the school through careful management of visitors and effective security measures.

p.5

Organisation

The school maintains a generally good approach to matters of fire safety however systems and procedures for fire risk assessment lack consistency. The school pays good attention to ensuring boarders are not exposed to risks and hazards through careful attention to risk assessment on and off site and through prompt attention to any concerns or defects that arise. More day -to -day activities in boarding have however not been subject to formal risk assessment.

p.5

Organisation

Boarders receive excellent levels of pastoral and academic support in the boarding house through the system of personal tutors. This is further supported by the well regarded input of prefects. Staff work well with the school to ensure boarders’ needs are met. The school is also working towards improving the accessibility and effectiveness of the Independent Listener role as an additional support. Boarders are provided with an excellent structure of support around academic work that helps them develop effective studying skills and improve their academic performance.

p.5

Organisation

The promotion of equality and diversity is outstanding.

p.5

Organisation

The school positively recognises and celebrates cultural and religious diversity and ensures the needs of boarders are well met. The atmosphere in the boarding house, which accommodates boarders from a wide range of backgrounds, is inclusive and harmonious and there is no evidence of inappropriate discrimination.

p.5

Organisation

The school has good systems in place to ensure the views of boarders are listened to and they make an active contribution to how boarding is organised and delivered.

p.5

Organisation

The accommodation provided for boarders is of a very high standard and offers them excellent facilities for day -to -day living and study.

p.5

Organisation

The school provides clear and comprehensive information on boarding life, expectations and criteria for admission for potential boarders and their families. Boarding is well managed by a suitably experienced and enthusiastic team. The value and contribution of boarding is well recognised and promoted in the school. Boarding staff are well supported and have access to relevant training opportunities. Staffing levels in boarding during the week are good. However the increasing numbers of full boarders across a wider age range means that the lower level of weekend staffing cover is less satisfactory. 5 of 7 Inspection Report: Royal Grammar School,13 November 2008 There is effective monitoring of boarding practice carried out both formally and informally to ensure boarders are being looked after well and there is an evident commitment in the school to critically self-evaluate practice and positively respond to constructive criticism.

p.5

Organisation

ensure consistent records of medication administration are maintained and that more formal assessment of self medication arrangements for boarders is undertaken (NMS 15)

p.6

Organisation

ensure fire risk assessments are kept up to date, available at all times and subject to regular review. (NMS 26)

p.6

Organisation

ensure recruitment procedures fully comply with the relevant National Minimum Standards and that supervision of staff appointed prior to completion of all checks is formalised. (NMS 38)

p.6

Organisation

ensure that procedures for risk assessment are extended to cover the physical environment and working practices in the boarding house. (NMS 40)

p.6

Organisation

review the levels of staffing cover provided in boarding during weekend periods. (NMS 31)

p.6

Statutory requirements

This section sets out the actions, which must be taken so that the registered person meets the Care Standards Act 2000, and the National Minimum Standards. The Registered Provider must comply with the given timescales.

p.6

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the registered person should take account of the following recommendation(s): • ensure consistent records of medication administration are maintained and that more formal assessment of self medication arrangements for boarders is undertaken (NMS 15) • ensure fire risk assessments are kept up to date, available at all times and subject to regular review. (NMS 26) • ensure recruitment procedures fully comply with the relevant National Minimum Standards and that supervision of staff appointed prior to completion of all checks is formalised. (NMS 38) • ensure that procedures for risk assessment are extended to cover the physical environment and working practices in the boarding house. (NMS 40) • review the levels of staffing cover provided in boarding during weekend periods. (NMS 31) 6 of 7 Inspection Report: Royal Grammar School,13 November 2008

p.6

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion